LeftColumnBK

State Goes for Green; Will Convert Fleet to Natural Gas, Propane

RICHMOND - Trading in Virginia’s gas-guzzling fleet of trucks and cars for greener models will help improve the state’s air quality, put Virginians to work and even save tax dollars, Gov. Bob McDonnell says.

“We think Virginia is doing its part by converting from gasoline that comes in part from foreign countries to either natural gas or electricity or propane or hydrogen or some other fuel will show that we’re serious about American energy independence,” McDonnell said Tuesday.

The state plans to vastly expand its use of alternative fuels, such as propane and natural gas, to power its 10,000-vehicle fleet and could seek proposals from suppliers and car manufacturers as early as this month. The proposals will help the state determine the cost of converting many of its trucks and cars to run on a fuel other than petroleum.

Lawmakers threw their support behind converting the fleet during this past General Assembly session and also passed a bill that is expected to accelerate the use of electric vehicles by Virginia drivers.

And Tuesday, McDonnell signed an executive order to begin this conversion process, which could begin within the year.

Relying more on alternative fuels is part of McDonnell’s effort to make Virginia the energy capital of the East Coast. Although McDonnell advocates for offshore oil drilling, he also supports offshore wind farms as well as the expansion of nuclear power and research into energy produced by burning wood waste, manure and garbage, known as biomass.

About 1,200 state vehicles run on E-85, which is ethanol blended with gasoline, and a handful of diesel trucks the Virginia Department of Transportation operates run on biodiesel, said Mike Bisogno, fleet manager for the state Department of General Services.

The department operates 4,000 vehicles that various state agencies use. It spent $4.2 million on fuel during the past year — an extra $33,000 of that was spent to buy more than 12,000 gallons of E-85 fuel, according to the state Department of General Services.

But McDonnell said he wants state trucks and cars to run on compressed natural gas and propane gas — fuels that are produced in the United States and even in Virginia — in addition to E-85 capable cars, often referred to as flex-fuel cars.

McDonnell said not all state vehicles will be converted, because some vehicles, like state police cars, may not be a good fit for alternative fuels.

He acknowledged that the state would incur upfront costs for the vehicles and tanks as well as employee training, but the petroleum fuel savings will more than pay for the program.

The cost to buy vehicles that can run on alternative fuels varies. Some vehicles could be converted to run on alternative fuels, such as propane, for about $10,000.

A new electric Ford Focus would cost $20,000 to $30,000 — more than a standard gas-fueled Focus, which can cost about $16,000, according to a Richmond Ford dealer who attended the executive order signing Tuesday.

Bisogno said there is no price difference between state vehicles that run on E-85 fuel and their petroleum-fueled counterparts.

Green movement in high gear
Federal law requires all states to buy cars and light pickup trucks for their fleets that can run on alternative fuels. Many states buy flex-fuel cars to meet the federal requirement, but they don’t have to buy E-85, said Patrick O’Connor, legislative counsel for the NAFA Fleet Management Association. The association represents fleet managers for utility companies, corporations plus local and state governments.

Some states, like Utah and Florida, are using fuels like natural gas to run heavy-duty vehicles, like dump trucks or buses, O’Connor said.

Delegate Danny Marshall, R-Danville, said he wanted to use natural gas and methane gas, which are produced in the southwest corner of the state.

“It’s a win that the energy is created here, a win that the jobs are going to be created here. And the other win is that we are not sending our money to the Middle East,” Marshall said. “I just think it makes a lot of sense.”

Marshall sponsored a bill calling for the administration to convert the fleet, the go-ahead that McDonnell needed to move ahead.

Air pollution controls in Northern Virginia also prompted lawmakers to pass a bill that would allow retailers, like Kmart and Walmart, to offer charging stations for electric car drivers. McDonnell also ceremonially signed this bill into law Tuesday.

Until now, only public utility companies could sell electricity and a law change was needed to allow the retail charging stations, said Delegate David Bulova, D-Fairfax, who sponsored the bill.

He said he wants to encourage more drivers to buy electric vehicles because they can run on energy produced in Virginia and create less pollution than gas-powered vehicles — a key advantage for Northern Virginia, which does not meet air quality standards, Bulova said.

“None of this is possible, if the infrastructure doesn’t exist to make electric vehicles practical and convenient,” he said.

McDonnell said he hopes the state’s investment in these new technologies will create the infrastructure needed to serve localities and Virginia motorists.

Comments  

 
0 #8 Guest 2011-07-17 12:07
Quoting JSw0rds:
eco2,

With respect, supporting regulations would be putting the cart well out in front of the horse. What is needed is a comprehensive study of the ROI and the freedom for local municipalities and agencies to make up their own minds.


Well, how local do you want to get? I think that regulations at the level of municipalities is too narrow. Just think of the coal plant in Surrey and how far the deposits go? We affect our neighbors, and on a large scale, what we in the US do affects the entire world. If you think that taking the consequences of your behavior and choices into account is important at all, we need a more integrated approach than just our neigborhoods or municipalities.
Quote
 
 
+1 #7 Guest 2011-07-15 16:56
Very well stated, JCCtheCNGman. JCC officials should lead by example rather than buy into the popular electric myth (which has, unfortunately, been swallowed whole by a significant percentage of their constituents). Sadly, present leadership trails an often fickle public opinion and only seeks to keep the misinformed majority happy. Thus the need to keep actions localized so that if community X wants to make a serious mistake, they won't pull down community Y with them via force of law (i.e state regulations). Keep up the good argument.
Quote
 
 
+2 #6 Guest 2011-07-14 16:57
eco2,

With respect, supporting regulations would be putting the cart well out in front of the horse. What is needed is a comprehensive study of the ROI and the freedom for local municipalities and agencies to make up their own minds.
Quote
 
 
+3 #5 Guest 2011-07-14 16:30
:cry: Unfortunately, much of the information contained in this article is flawed/wrong. The cost of conversion could be easily brought down to about $6,000 per vehicle and lower ($4,000) when retrofitting. Police cars could be converted as they will still have the use of gasoline in order to provide the extra 10% of horsepower. Keep in mind that your overall driving range will nearly double; i.e., if you could drive 400 miles on one tank of gas, if need be, you will be able to drive approximately 750 miles in a CNG converted vehicle. This doesn't even approach the significant savings of how CNG vehicle engines last almost 3 times longer than gas fuel engines. This is off the charts when looking at capital replacement for local governments. The Pro's and Con's of CNG conversion are so far to the CNG side it is pathetic that lawmakers have not "forced" the changeover as they are with the much misunderstood so called benefits of electic vehicles, there are none. I will be slapped for that statement, but when you figure in the "energy" to produce the electricity versus that to fill a CNG tank, it's another plus on the CNG side. We should NEVER purchase an electric vehicle for the JCC government vehicle stable; a gross misuse of funds.

The faster we as a society convert our transportation sector to CNG, the quicker we'll have more money in our pockets and near elimination of foreign oil dependency. It will also more or less "eliminate" any potential "oil conflicts" as we are engaged now. The US has the ability to support our transportation sector for over 100 years with just the current "known" natural gas reserves. I'm sure this will be enough time for our scientists to come up with an alternative, emission free fuel. I applaud Ms. Jones who is the JCC Supervisor Chairwoman in bringing this topic back to the forefront. When Mr. McGlennon, Goodson and Icenhour fell all over themselves in the Virginia Gazette article about JCC becoming the "cornerstone" of Virginia in promoting the "Electric" phenomenom, I almost puked. Their complete ignorance of this complex issue is scary; and they're supposed to be our "leaders". Such blind comments are why we are in the position we are with the national, state and local governments. James City County MUST get an infrastructure plan in place and start an aggressive conversion process; or, we'll become a county of cars sitting in their driveways. Oil will be at the least $150 a barrel by next Spring and that's just 8 months away. We need leaders to take ahold of this issue and lead the nation in showing how valuable conversion to CNG is to our transportation sector. If the past is any indication of leadership in our local government, we are doomed.
Quote
 
 
+6 #4 Guest 2011-07-14 12:23
Chairman Jones did discuss the issue, but, the County had previously started introducing natural gas buses back in the 2000-2003 time frame. The discussion had been taking place for years. The conversion was also discussed at various Green meeting in the last several years. She should still be applauded for her concerns, but she is not the only one to have the discussions.

Maybe her being ahead of the curve on the Governor's proposal comes from her close relationship with Delegate Pogge. Her other supporters from Tuesday night dispute the Green House Gas Theory and Global Warming. Does she? I'd like to know her opinion.
Quote
 
 
-4 #3 Guest 2011-07-14 09:12
Isn't this the same thing that Chairman Mary Jones has been encouraging, CNG for JCC since she was unanymously elected as Chairman of the Board???
Quote
 
 
+6 #2 Guest 2011-07-14 08:02
I appreciate McDonnell's visions for the role of Virginia on the East Coast. I am a supporter of strong development and identity on a state level. May we please also add solar energy to this vision, since there is plenty of free clean sun around here? As soon as they are available, I will rent solar panels for my roof. Companies are already renting these for a monthly charge slightly more than what we are paying for coal powered electric bills, and that includes the installation. We need supporting regulations.
Quote
 
 
+14 #1 Guest 2011-07-14 07:37
Some years ago, CW switched out their diesel buses for natural gas buses. The air quality improvement was immediate. I still remember those black clouds that came out of the tailpipe at every stop sign.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town