Subscribe to our Headlines

Republicans Announce U.S. Senate Candidates Looking to Challenge Warner is your source for free news and information in Williamsburg, James City & York Counties.

U.S. Sen. Mark Warner

U.S. Sen. Mark Warner

The election is nine months away, but the challengers looking to unseat Democrat Mark Warner from the U.S. Senate are lining up.

Four Republicans have filed paperwork to be considered for the party’s nomination: Edward “Ed” Gillespie, an Alexandria communications consultant, former White House aide and the former chairman of the Republican National Committee; Anthony “Tony” DeTora, a Fredricksburg  resident who serves as a senior policy adviser for California’s Rep. Dana Rohrabacher; Wayshak “Shak” Hill, a Centreville resident who is a retired U.S. Air Force pilot and a financial planning consultant; and Charles “Chuck” Moss, a Nokesville man who owns a network consulting business.

Along with the four Republican challengers, Libertarian Robert C. Sarvis — who won 6.52 percent of the vote as the Libertarian candidate for governor of Virginia in the 2013 election — has also announced he wants run for Warner’s seat. The Libertarian Party of Virginia will nominate its candidate Saturday in Richmond.

“While it’s a long way to June, and even further to November, I can say one thing with absolute certainty: each of these four men would be a far better U.S. Senator than Mark Warner, and I look forward to working with our eventual nominee to return Mark Warner to the private sector,” Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Pat Mullins said in a statement.

RPV will select its candidate to run against Warner at the June 7 convention in Roanoke.

Warner, the senior senator from Virginia, is currently finishing out his first term.

“I am asking Virginians to rehire me to keep fighting for bipartisan, common sense solutions to create jobs, get our fiscal house in order, and ensure that all Virginians have a fair shot at economic opportunity,” Warner said in a January statement. “I am proud of my record of working across party lines to put Virginia and our nation first. … I look forward to putting my independent, bipartisan record up against whichever candidate the Republicans nominate at their convention in June.”

Gillespie released a video when he announced his campaign in January.

“If elected, I’ll be a servant of the people of Virginia. And a leader for policies that grow the middle class and foster upward mobility, enabling people to lift themselves out of poverty,” Gillespie said in the video, “policies that will make life better for working families and those who want to work but can’t now find a job.”

A request for comment from the Gillespie campaign was not returned by the time this article was published.

Hill has already launched a campaign website.

“Many of us had high hopes that Senator Warner would have honored his pledge to represent Virginia to Washington. Unfortunately, five years later, Mr. Warner’s voting record confirms that he votes 97 percent with Harry Reid and is no longer representing Virginia,” Hill told WYDaily. “In fact, he promised us on video that he would not vote for a healthcare bill that took away our right to choose but he voted for it anyway. He has disappointed us and as such should not be our senator.”

On his website, Hill links to this YouTube video from Warner.

DeTora said on his campaign website he believes the checks and balances woven into the U.S. Constitution have been frayed over the past 200 years.

“I want Virginians, and all Americans, to live free from the burdens of government domination,” DeTora said in an email to WYDaily. “Sen. Mark Warner has a record in Washington of imposing those burdens – undermining the blessings of liberty, decreasing happiness, and weighing down economic opportunity. Washington must make a choice to trust Americans, rather than trying to control them. To accomplish that, Virginia’s first step is to send the right people to Washington.”

Sarvis told WYDaily he will run if he is nominated by the Libertarian Party at their convention in Richmond on Saturday.

“Many of the themes I ran on last year, like cronyism and government overreach, apply even more forcefully to the federal government,” Sarvis said. “The federal government is doing too much, it’s doing most of it poorly, it’s wasting taxpayer money, people are suffering, and our rights are being infringed. It makes a lot of sense to keep the most important issues before the voters and offer them a candidate, party, and platform worth voting for. It makes sense to try to build on the momentum we had last year, to recruit more candidates who adhere to libertarian principles, to put wind in their sails by campaigning with them, and to convince more people that the only way to achieve a more open and competitive political system is to vote against the two-party system and invest in a mainstream Libertarian Party offering workable solutions.”

Moss has run a networking consulting business since 1996, working with clients from several industries and the Department of Defense.

“Increasingly the challenges our country faces in both security and the economy require an understanding of the technology involved,” Moss wrote in an email WYDaily. “I have many years of experience solving technical challenges for clients in a cost-effective manner. If elected I will bring my engineering skills and small business perspective to Washington to produce better legislation and more effective oversight.”

Share This Post

Posted by on February 4, 2014. Filed under James City Govt,Local News,Wmbg Govt Notebook,York Govt Notebook. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

10 Responses to Republicans Announce U.S. Senate Candidates Looking to Challenge Warner

  1. Matthew Weaver

    March 16, 2014 at 10:24 am

    See more about Chuck Moss, candidate for U.S. Senate at Chuck Moss is the clear alternative to lobbyist Gillespie or politician Warner.

  2. Norge

    February 5, 2014 at 3:55 pm


    In a time more civilized than the present, one could identify oneself and in a spirit of 1st amendment glory, not be subject to retaliation by various interests. The case is no longer so. It is unfortunate. A few “Blaggards” who cannot keep a civil tongue or quill have harmed us all. However, often times it is not “offensive” language that is the problem, but “politically incorrect” language. I had to look-up “Blaggards” to make sure that there was no blaggard “community” to offend or malign. I found none and am reasonably certain that I am safe from retaliation. Assuredly, I agree with you but privacy is more prudent.

  3. Norge

    February 5, 2014 at 3:37 pm

    To find the answer to your question: which polls? I recommend that you investigate the news media of the time period just before the vote on the bill itself was cast, not pre-election, 2012, after the legislation was passed.

  4. CitiZen

    February 4, 2014 at 9:59 pm

    What polls are you referencing. Not to say you are wrong, but I have never heard that over 50% of Virginians polled were against it. Obama carried VA quite handily, and the ACA was a well discussed plank in the campaign platform.

  5. Drew Gruber

    February 4, 2014 at 5:06 pm

    It would behoove us to look into records of any Senator, democrat or republican before making blanket statements. Their voting records, amendments to bills, etc. are all available at for our study. In fact of the 617 pieces of legislation associated with him it seems over half are co-sponsored or in cooperation with a Republican. The latest piece of legislation that pops up as Warner’s is aimed at re-installing the cuts made to veteran pensions by Paul Ryan’s budget deal. I’ve not noticed my taxes going up since he took office in the district. Sales tax and the Newport News real estate assessments went up but that decision isnt made by a Senator. Moreover we as citizens in his district have the ability to write him, take those polls and weigh- to build a relationship so that you know if he is voting for or against you and yours.

    What is also amazing is how no one signs their posts. If you cannot commit your name to what you write perhaps its unfounded or inflammatory. Regardless it’s obvious you aren’t committed to your opinion so perhaps its best left unsaid.

  6. Norge

    February 4, 2014 at 12:32 pm

    Real question here: How can you say that he votes on behalf of the people when he voted for ObamaCare and more than 60% of those polled, in Virginia, at the time, indicated that they were not in favor of ObamaCare. I fully understand that it is within his rights as a Senator to vote on our behalf, however, that would be under either extraordinary circumstances or his constituents polled opinions being at or around 50%/50%. The case was neitheror even close with some nationally recognized polls indicating greater than of Virginians 70% disfavored it.

  7. Jack

    February 4, 2014 at 11:49 am

    He has done wonders! Like pass Obamacare. And raise our taxes! He hasn’t pressed the President to explain fast and furious, the gun sales to Mexican drug cartels, or press him to explain Benghazi and why 4 Americans were killed, or the IRS scandal. Really?

  8. Amazing

    February 4, 2014 at 11:44 am

    He is part of the problem in Washington, he doesn’t compromise, he toes his party line. I think every member of Congress should be changed, throw all of them out and start anew.

    I haven’t liked his votes on military veterans, and his votes to increase energy costs have hurt my family.

  9. Bill

    February 4, 2014 at 10:48 am

    Nice try, Phyl.

  10. Phyl

    February 4, 2014 at 10:37 am

    Mark Warner has been an outstanding Senator, as he was a Governor. He is very reasoned, can compromise, listens and responds to his constituents.
    We could not have a better Senator. Re-elect Senator Warner!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Website Development: Web Development Technology Partners, inc.