Subscribe to our Headlines

Virginia Supreme Court Agrees to Hear York Oyster Farming Case

Two York County oyster farmers’ years-long battle to continue to commercially farm and harvest oysters at their homes without a special-use permit persists, as the county looks to the Virginia Supreme Court to appeal the October decision from the York-Poquoson Circuit Court.

On Wednesday, the state’s supreme court accepted a pair of petitions filed on behalf of York County that look to overturn the lower court’s ruling that Greg Garrett and Anthony Bavuso may farm oysters on their properties without special permission from the county. York County Attorney James Barnett Jr. filed the petitions for appeal in January.

Because the petitions for appeal have been accepted — without a preliminary hearing where Barnett would have to make a case as to why the supreme court should listen to the full case — Barnett now has a chance to convince the court to overturn the Circuit Court decision. Barnett said a hearing likely won’t come until after Labor Day.

The petitions do not address whether Garrett and Bavuso are allowed to harvest oysters in the water, as the county does not have jurisdiction there. The question is whether they are allowed to use their land to facilitate aquaculture, as the county zoning ordinance applies to land they own.

Barnett said he received a phone call Wednesday from the Supreme Court that informed him of the court’s decision.

An email sent to Garrett was not returned by the time this article was published.

The Virginia Supreme Court has agreed to listen to the elements in the case that concern county ordinance. The petition to appeal the Garrett decision said the court incorrectly determined that Garrett’s oyster aquaculture is not an aquaculture as defined in the York County zoning ordinance. Both petitions said the court ignored the requirement in county code for a special-use permit that would authorize the docking of workboats and the offloading of seafood in a residential zone.

You can read about other issues contained in the petitions by clicking here.

The long-running dispute between Garrett/Bavuso and the county stretches back to the original question of whether they need special-use permits to use their property in commercial oyster harvesting.

Garrett applied for a special-use permit in September 2010, but he withdrew his application after the York Planning Commission recommended the supervisors not approve the request in November 2010. In the summer of 2011, the county received photographs that were taken over four days in July of non-residents unloading oysters on Garrett’s property, which caused the county to issue a violation notice. In January 2012, the Board of Zoning Appeals heard Garrett’s appeal of the violation notice and decided Garrett was in violation. His case then went to the York-Poquoson Circuit Court.

In January 2011, the Board of Zoning Appeals decided Bavuso would need a special-use permit to operate his home oyster farming business. He applied for one from the Board of Supervisors, but that request was denied. Bavuso’s case also went to the Circuit Court, where the court ruled in favor of both Bavuso and Garrett.

Previous Coverage:

York County Files Petition with Virginia Supreme Court Over Residential Oyster Farming
York County to Appeal Rulings in Oyster Cases
Judge Rules in Favor of York Oyster Farmers
Circuit Court Hears Garrett Oyster Case
Judge Delays Ruling in Bavuso Oyster Case
Circuit Court to Decide Oyster Cases This Week

Share This Post

RSS
Posted by on May 10, 2013. Filed under Local News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

5 Responses to Virginia Supreme Court Agrees to Hear York Oyster Farming Case

  1. another york citizen Reply

    May 19, 2013 at 8:53 am

    Virginia Slim: If no one wants a farm next to them then where will all the farms be? Somewhere else? By your logic somewhere else won’t want them next door either. Then where does the food come from?

    Oh that’s right China and Vietnam… 90% of seafoord is currently imported from a foreign country. Hope you enjoy the shrimp from China (and whatever else may be in it).

  2. Virginia Slim Reply

    May 10, 2013 at 1:43 pm

    Maybe you would like a commercial seafood operation to open up next door to you? Commercial boats, trucks and noise would be your constant companion. There is a very good reason that commercial enterprises are not allowed in areas zoned for residential uses. Same with Factories, Pawn Shops and Pool Halls. Homeowners do not want them next door. When someone buys a home in an area designated as residential, they have a right not to have a commercial enterprise move in next door. If these guys want to run a seafood business, they should do it on a property where it is legal to do so.

  3. Taxpayer Reply

    May 10, 2013 at 9:24 am

    Just how much time and money has been spent on trying to keep people form using their property for what they want, not just what the county lets them use it for? This is exactly why you need a permit to replace a water heater in your house. All the county wants is to put their hand in your pocket and take more and more of it away, along with your rights.

    • Coming to your neighborhood soon Reply

      May 11, 2013 at 7:14 am

      Hi Taxpayer! So what street do you live on? We would like to open a Wal-Mart there.

  4. Citizen Reply

    May 10, 2013 at 8:28 am

    York County wants to destroy small business owners! Shame on them! What a waste of tax payers money. Best wishes to Garrett and Bavuso!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Website Development: Web Development Technology Partners, inc.